A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out in between potential neighbours in excess of the development of a wall in a coastal web site in a very north Dublin suburb, a case that has captivated national focus pursuing an Irish Periods report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres over a proposed loved ones dwelling at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of arranging breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Times article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what started as a neighborhood disagreement has advanced into a extremely publicised authorized fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building will work at the positioning on Dublin Street, Sutton, where by Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a health care provider and a corporation director respectively, search for to develop their relatives household. The situation happens to be emblematic of broader disputes together Eire’s coastline, where by enhancement pressures collide with environmental protections plus the sensitivities of recognized people. In accordance with the Irish Moments report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall getting made by their prospective neighbours goes beyond the boundaries permitted less than setting up authorization.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both equally residents of Dublin Highway, declare that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the terms of their planning authorization by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their website, bringing about an encroachment over a Unique Space of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as such parts are topic to rigorous controls under European and Irish environmental legislation. Within their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even insignificant encroachments could have Long lasting ecological implications, especially in a very sensitive coastal environment such as Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny they are in breach of their scheduling permission, and say the wall, that's partially created, is in the correct situation. Their legal staff has characterised the action being an try and delay or frustrate a lawful enhancement. The couple accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their see, an allegation that has been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of many coastal setting up disputes, wherever sights of The ocean are both of those really prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained dramatic initiatives because of the plaintiffs to doc the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by way of ocean in storm to photograph the website, In keeping with sworn proof referenced within the Irish Situations. In a single account, Rene Collier waded by midsection-high h2o during a storm to photograph the website Irish Periods, a picture which includes due to the fact grow to be emblematic on the depth of your dispute. These actions weren't simply symbolic; they were being intended to Obtain visual evidence with the wall’s place relative to tidal strains and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the location through the sea Irish Instances reported, describing how The 2 Adult men entered the water all through intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by means of storm h2o to photograph the site grew to become The most striking descriptions to emerge from court docket reporting. The Irish Occasions short article about accountant Paul Feely famous that this kind of actions had been cited to reveal the plaintiffs’ belief the wall extended into a place influenced by tidal movement, strengthening their argument that the SAC was currently being encroached upon.
The events at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 ended up included in detail through the countrywide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Instances 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Instances January 27 2026 turned greatly searched phrases as visitors sought to be aware of the track record and implications of the case. On that date, the High Court listened to additional submissions on regardless of whether interim orders should be granted to halt development pending a full hearing. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a important instant while in the lawful timeline.
For the core of the dispute is a disagreement in excess of boundaries, setting up compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely retain the wall, as created, goes over and above what was accepted and intrudes into guarded land. They argue that this is not a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by job, has actually been referred to as meticulous in his examination of planning files, maps, and ailments connected to your authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have the two stressed that their action is enthusiastic by René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Times 27 Jan 2026 concern for environmental protection and adherence to scheduling law. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it is about making sure that growth at Sutton Strand respects legal and ecological limitations. In affidavits, they have described their long-standing relationship to the area as well as their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite facet, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed by themselves as a pair basically seeking to establish a relatives household in accordance with the regulation. They deny which the wall encroaches over a Specific Place of Conservation and say that all works are actually completed based on Expert information and accepted strategies. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, such as getting into the sea throughout a storm, do not change the fundamental specifics.
The situation has also elevated broader questions on how arranging disputes are solved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter courtroom dispute in excess of development of wall at coastal web-site has grown to be a shorthand description for your condition that numerous observers see as significantly popular. As sea concentrations increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation in between non-public land, community foreshore, and protected habitats is starting to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been associated with local advocacy on scheduling and environmental challenges, while not at this scale. Meanwhile, the Irish Situations short article about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how folks from very unique Skilled backgrounds can discover on their own aligned in such disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some stories spell their names, have grown to be synonymous with the Sutton Strand situation.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the internet site through the sea Irish Times coverage emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded via waistline-superior water through a storm to photograph the site Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-substantial h2o during a storm to photograph the positioning Irish Periods are phrases that appeared repeatedly in coverage, reflecting the two the Bodily fact of your coastline and also the symbolic nature in the act. For supporters on the plaintiffs, these steps shown motivation; for critics, they illustrated the things they see being an abnormal tactic.
Given that the High Court proceedings continue, the outcome continues to be unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether the wall as constructed complies with preparing permission and no matter whether any encroachment into a Specific Spot of Conservation has transpired. The authorized arguments are intricate, involving interpretation of maps, tidal knowledge, and arranging problems. Nevertheless the human factor stays central: neighbours who should Dwell along with each other lengthy once the authorized fees are already paid out.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing above building functions at the site on Dublin Highway, Sutton, though the implications of the case extend further than that tackle. For planners, builders, and inhabitants alike, the dispute serves as being a reminder of the necessity of clarity in arranging permissions and sensitivity in coastal improvement. It also underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when essential difficulties for example environmental protection and residence rights are perceived to get at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a spot of natural magnificence and contested boundaries. The wall in the centre on the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized questions. No matter whether it will eventually be altered, taken off, or finished as planned will count on the court docket’s conclusions. Until finally then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their versions will probable go on to look in headlines, joined indelibly to Just about the most intently viewed arranging disputes in north Dublin lately.